Is social media responsible for the emo movement?
I’m curious to explore whether it is possible that social media and new technologies can be directly linked to today’s growing emo culture. Before I get into this, let’s first take a look at the latest statistics from eMarketer regarding teens and their online consumption.
Although these statistics are based on research with U.S teens, I am highly inclined to say it’s indicative of what we are seeing in this part of the world.
- 19% of active Internet users in July this year (32.4 million people) were under 18
- 82% of US teens (12-17 years old) will use Internet monthly next year
- Nearly 2/3 of all teens have a mobile phone
- They navigate between different options for communication (text messaging, IM, social networking, email) – and expect the transition between these options to be seamless
- Teens DO NOT care about nor distinguish between ‘online’, ‘offline’ and ‘mobile’ communications – it’s purely about ‘COMMUNICATION’
- The tools they use to interact with one another are less important than how simple the actual interaction is, how seamlessly they can move across devices and how engaging the actual experience is
These teens don’t care about the mobile devices they use nor do they consider how it is made possible that they can jump online from anywhere. They are only actively thinking about the conversations they are having with their friends online – I can chat with my friends via IM, email, we can connect on Facebook and MySpace, we can text message, we can even catch up in cool virtual worlds. Today’s 'digital natives' expect to be able to communicate online from anywhere and at anytime.
I have plenty of questions. Will there be dire implications with the fact that teens make no distinction between ‘online’ and ‘offline’ communication? Is social media creating the Great Social Divide? Is this audience highly sociable online but less attentive in real life? Will we see a growing number of social media junkies turn real life recluse?
As Jack Sargeant put it in The Australian last year: “Youth subcultures emerge, vanish and mutate continually. Often this happens beneath the radar of the news media and is of interest only to the adherents of the trend and perhaps their peers. When these subcultures do enter the spotlight it is almost invariably because of a perceived crisis; traditionally, narcotic and sexual abandon, crime and suicide.”
This is indicative of what we have seen with the rise of the emo on the likes of MySpace. Is social media responsible for the emo-generation? I had never even heard of the term ‘emo’ until social networking site, MySpace, was launched.
Last year, two girls committed a double suicide. Unfortunately, this is a tragedy that could have been avoided. A message was even posted on their MySpace profiles - "RIP Jodie and Steph" - a day before the girls went missing.
Are teens breeding unhealthy habits online? When I was a kid, my parents told me to play outside and get some sunshine. There’s something to be said about the amount of time teens spend online today.
Really interested to hear your thoughts? Is social media playing a part in the growing emo subculture? Should we be monitoring the online activities and rituals of those that are under 18? Penny for your thoughts!
Comments
In my part of the world social media is giving youths a voice, some kind of voice, where prior they wouldn't have been able to communicate/demonstrate. I came across this video that explores how the digital world 'allows many Iranians access to ideas and freedom of expression they haven't had for close to thirty years." http://www.vfs.com/blog/2008/11/19/iran-blogging-motionographer/
i'm currently researching towards writing a dissertation on how the effect the internet has had/is having on the emo
Hi Ross - I'd be really keen to see what you come up with. What in particular are you explorin? There are some good examples that can be used to support both sides of this debate. On one hand, there is the argument that the Internet and new Web 2.0 tools such as Twitter and social networking sites are giving the youth a voice, in some countries this is something they have not had before, and then there's the other side of the argument that it is impeding on real face-to-face interactions and leading to harmful behaviour such as with the MySpace examples.
i'm really just looking at how emo and hardcore communities interacted before the internet, and now with the internet - comparing the differences and discussing whether or not it is a positive or negative thing. i could really do with some statistics to work with, if you have any further information on that? i think my arguments in the positive sense, would be globalisation and accessibility.. negative, possibly that the physical sense of community has deteriorated - that is something i will determine through empirical research, though.
ross x